ZetaTalk Chat Q&A for November 17, 2012
Would the Zetas care to comment on if the upcoming solar eclipse November 13th and 14th, will be used as an opportunity to create awareness of PX and it's effects? Or if it will go as scheduled. http://science1.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/07nov_totaleclipse/ [and from another] http://eclipse.gsfc.nasa.gov/SEmono/TSE2012/TSE2012.html The path of the Moon's umbral shadow crosses the South Pacific Ocean where it makes no landfall except for northern Australia. The first and only populated region in the path lies along the east coast of Queensland. The Moon's penumbral shadow produces a partial eclipse visible from a much larger region covering Australia, New Zealand, and the South Pacific. After leaving Australia, the umbral shadow glides over the ocean, undisturbed by further landfall for the remainder of its track. The instant of greatest eclipse occurs in the South Pacific at 22:11:48 UT.
Eclipses almost invariably show evidence of Planet X and its Moon Swirls, but not directly in photos taken of the eclipse itself as the solar filters used to reduce the glare of the Sun blacken the sky and snuff out all evidence of reflected sunlight from Planet X or its components. The sky is not blue but black, such are the filters used. Planet X and its Moon Swirls are most evident when filters for light in the red spectrum are used, or a welder’s lens that is not too dark. Nevertheless, evidence of Planet X was there for the spectators to see, though most would look past this for the grand display of a darkened Sun.
Looks like the cover-up artists are scraping the barrel to invent more laughable excuses and lies that allegedly explain some real Planet X related earth changes. Not only is the mainstream media in the U.S. doubling down on global warming/climate change being responsible for Hurricane Sandy and, by implication, other extreme weather events, those who control the media want to connect atmospheric carbon dioxide to increased “space junk” and collisions in space. Do the elite really think the 99% are stupid enouigh to believe this lie, or is this evidence of desperation in the cover up? Could the Zetas elaborate on or debunk this apparent nonsense like only ZetaTalk can? Arctic sea ice is decreasing at an unprecedented rate, and the public is supposed to believe this is directly related to “climate change.” Yet, at the same time, sea ice in the Antarctic is increasing, which presents an obvious contradiction and problem for the cover up. Is wind strength a valid explanation for why sea ice is increasing in the Antarctic? Attempts to connect "global warming" with satellites and "space junk" tell me the cover-up artists have reached a new level of chutzpah. Articles purporting to explain away earth changes and signs in the sky often appear in the media on the same day and are akin to birth announcements for new Establishment Lies and disinfo. Search "wind Antarctic sea ice" and "carbon dioxide space junk," note the publication dates, and you will see what I mean. [and from another] http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/11/atmospheric-co2-risks-increasing-space-junk-study/ Atmospheric CO2 risks increasing space junk: study, A build-up of carbon dioxide in the upper levels of Earth’s atmosphere risks causing a faster accumulation of man-made space junk and resulting in more collisions. While it causes warming on Earth, CO2 conversely cools down the atmosphere and contracts its outermost layer, the thermosphere, where many satellites including the International Space Station (ISS) operate. A contracted thermosphere, in turn, reduces atmospheric “drag” on satellites. A cooler troposphere will extend the lifetime of space junk — staying farther out for longer instead of burning up in the lower layers of the atmosphere, closer to Earth. We would see some effects on services provided from space if an important satellite was destroyed by a collision. [and from another] http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/11/11/satellites-reveal-why-antarctic-sea-ice-grows-as-arctic-melts/ Satellites reveal why Antarctic sea ice grows as Arctic melts. The mystery of the expansion of sea ice around Antarctica, at the same time as global warming is melting swaths of Arctic sea ice, has been solved using data from US military satellites. The Antarctic sea ice cover interacts with the global climate system very differently than that of the Arctic, and these results highlight the sensitivity of the Antarctic ice coverage to changes in the strength of the winds around the continent.
Why does the cover-up persist, when Obama is intent upon revealing the
truth about the Earth changes, revealing that Planet X, aka Nibiru, is the
cause? We stated that the announcement had only a 93% chance of
succeeding, due to the intense reluctance of many whose hands were on the
cover-up, and until and even after
the announcement this crowd hopes to confuse the issue. All who
participated in the cover-up – NASA on the presence of Planet X and the
role of solar flares, the Global Warming crowd on the cause of weather
extremes, the USGS on earthquake strength – all hope that the public
continues to be confused about the cause of these events.
Thus they emerge when any information pointing to the Earth wobble or the presence of a magnetic or gravity giant nearby is about to hit the news. The simultaneous reporting of Arctic melt with an increase in ice buildup in Antarctica was such a threat, suggesting that the Global Warming excuse does not suffice. If the air is getting warmer, worldwide, then why is Antarctica not melting? The cover-up crowd rushed into the fray, immediately, with speculation that points to Global Warming again. This battle will frankly never be put to rest, as the cover-up crowd will become more shrill while the evidence of Planet X becomes more apparent.
The ice melt in the Arctic and refreeze in Antarctica is due to the Earth wobble, which is vertical over the Pacific. When the Sun is over N America, the N Pole is pulled down, so that the warm Pacific waters are pushed through the Bearing Straits into the Arctic. This has resulted in the past in kelp and algae being found, floating in the Arctic. When the Sun is over the Pacific, a reverse vertical wobble occurs, the N Pole being shoved away by the hose of magnetic particles from Planet X. Antarctica is then pushed up into the warm Pacific waters of the South Seas, which then run under the ice fields of Antarctica and cause melting and large chunks of ice to break off, set adrift.
That Antarctica is simultaneously thawing in this manner and then refreezing can only be explained by the wobble, as re-freezing occurs when the globe is tipped down so Antarctica has been pushed far into the cold and the dark, away from the warm waters of the South Pacific. Therein lies the threat, as the wobble explains it all, and can be ascertained by the public if they examine the placement of the Sun during the day. Rushing in to assert that Global Warming is alive and well is the ridiculous excuse for satellite failure – the thermosphere is contracting. Of course the common man cannot determine this for themselves, but is expected to register that the experts claim that Global Warming is causing satellite failure. The theater of the absurd will not go away, and they have now sent in the clowns.
Recently images were uploaded to youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=HeFF0Jh3rWI# and posted by yourself, Nancy, on this PS Ning http://poleshift.ning.com/profiles/blogs/venus-and-dark-twin-looming-large-photos-new-zetatalk which are depicting, to the right of the Moon, a pale-ish and mysterious looking orb, which you suggested, after analysis, in a comment on the above-mentioned PS Ning blog, may be a capture of the Earth's Dark Twin. Would the Z's care to elaborate on this? Further speak to the possible implications of a DT on the move, if that's what this is?
As we mentioned earlier in 2012, in April and
June, the Dark Twin has fallen behind the
Earth, and is trying to pass the Earth in their shared orbit. The Dark
Twin is not a magnetic planet, and where it is caught along with Venus and
the Earth in the crab-like pincers of the eddy flow of particles coming
round Planet X, it is not in a magnetic dance. If fact, being farther out
into space, and shielded by the Earth, the Dark Twin has more of a chance
of escaping the crab-like pincers, as the particle flows dispel and dilute
out in space.
How close to the Earth will the Dark Twin come, while trying to pass the Earth in their shared orbit? No closer than it is at present, nor will visibility of this black hunk of rock increase if it does in fact manage to push past the Earth. The Dark Twin was visible from Earth when it first came round from behind the Sun, as sunlight reflected directly off the Dark Twin and thence to Earth. At that time, it appeared as a bluish object, with yellow shades. When the direct bounce of reflected sunlight ceased, it was lost, being primarily black and with a non-reflective surface. The Dark Twin has no atmosphere, no clouds, no water, no vegetation, and its black color indicates that its rock absorbs almost all light. Thus its potential passage and exit ahead of the Earth in their shared orbit will not be seen by man.
Would the zetas mind commenting on this strange UFO sighting? This object shows up a few times a week, it’s on some kind of schedule. My question is this some kind of military craft or ufo? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1AEQgEFqE40
Would a UFO keep regular hours? Daily, between noon and 1:00 pm over the Denver area. This is not a UFO, as they are known, an alien space ship. It is a recognizance drone, sent quickly aloft and zipped in this and that direction and then returned to base. It’s mission is to determine surveillance equipment that might be installed in the hills surrounding Denver. Thus sweeping the air space, and finding nothing installed, it is returned to its cradle. It is a propelled probe, does not have control over gravity as alien ships do, and is very light weight and thus can move rapidly.
I just found this article. Can the Zeta's tell us if this is meant to prepare the reader for an eventual disclosure by president Obama? There are too many similarities to be coincidence. Or is this just one more instance of attempting to muddy the waters. I did notice that the artistic rendition of the "Brown Dwarf" was brilliant blue! http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/49823152/ns/technology_and_science-space/ Here is the article, found on yahoo: http://news.yahoo.com/orphan-alien-planet-found-nearby-without-parent-star-122308193.html
NASA began “discovering” traveling planets over a decade ago, in 1998 and 2002. We explained in 2001 That the public was going to be educated, informed of what the elite had known all along, as the time when denial would no longer be possible. Now that Planet X is parked nearby, rattling and wobbling the Earth and quite visible in the sky, the elite have stepped up the pace. As much as possible, NASA will try to exclaim that they only recently became aware of the presence of Planet X, though the public will hardly buy this. They only recently became aware of the potential for traveling planets, and thus did not think to apply that explanation to the magnetic and gravity giant they discovered in their instruments, right next door.
What is the black dot that is showing up on BATSRUS magnetoshere images? [and from another] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WIND_%28spacecraft%29 Wind was launched on November 1, 1994 and is the first of two NASA spacecraft in the Global Geospace Science initiative and part of the ISTP Project. It was deployed to study radio and plasma that occur in the solar wind and in the Earth's magnetosphere before the solar wind reaches the Earth. The spacecraft's original mission was to orbit the Sun at the L1 Lagrangian point, but this was delayed when the SOHO and ACE spacecraft were sent to the same location. WIND has been at L1 continuously since 2004 [and from another] http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn6800-space-no-place-for-cheap-satellites.html Solar, Anomalous and Magnetospheric Particle Explorer satellite (SAMPLEX), whose orbit criss-crosses the radiation belts.
Is this the Dark Twin, making an appearance on the NASA magnetosphere
BATSRUS images just to the right or left of the Earth on the images? It is
indeed, but why is it moving about? The satellites providing data for
these images are many, positioned all around the Earth, near and at a
distance, and provide data about many particle flows affecting the
magnetosphere. The ACE, WIND, SAMPLEX, and the Stereo satellites
participate, among others, most orbiting the Lagrangian point between the
Earth and Sun. The models producing these images are computer programs,
which have been instructed on how to interpret various particle flows.
Thus the appearance of the black dots on the images, caused by the near presence of the Dark Twin, is a conglomeration of information from satellites in various positions around the Earth – to the front, back, side, and at a distance. The composition of the Earth is shown as a black circle, central to the modeled images. It should be no surprise that objects formed of rock, such as Venus, the Moon, or the Dark Twin would show up also as a black dot. Venus is far enough away to be excluded, and the Earth’s Moon is too small to be included, but the Dark Twin is closer to the Earth than Venus, and is as large as the Earth. Thus the particle flows from the Dark Twin are not ignored by the computer programs employed by the BATSRUS model.
What do the various positions of the Dark Twin on these images imply about the position of the Dark Twin during these dates, which show the Dark Twin switching about between the right and the left in the images, either in front of or behind the Earth. Satellites collecting data are not taking a picture of what is at a distance, they are recording particle flows in their vicinity, and can misjudge for elements they were never programmed to consider. The Dark Twin is directly behind the Earth at present, and closer to the Earth than ever before. But satellites behind the Earth and to one side will interpret a 2D particle flow view of these two hunks of rock as being side by side, or this or that one ahead of the other. This is a program failure, a modeling failure, on how to interpret a 2D image into a 3D model.
There is much amongst the voluminous ZetaTalk body, speaking to the subject of reincarnation http://www.zetatalk.com/beinghum/b00.htm. It is a central theme, the means by which we are experiencing our lessons here in third density, and beyond. During their discourse on reincarnation the Z have revealed how there is a Rule of Forgetfulness http://www.zetatalk.com/rules/r44.htm in play, during incarnations. Not so much a rule, as just the mere nature of being incarnated into a body, unaware. The Zeta have further explained that, if one digs around enough, gets in touch with the sub-conscious, which in turn may get soul-updates, details of past incarnations can be gleaned. Recently I came across a case, and there have been others similar, of a young boy, 11-year-old James Leininger, who has been shown to have amazingly detailed conscious memory of his former incarnation, in which he was a fighter pilot, killed during a mission over Japanese territory during WW2. This child remembers by sight, and recalls the names of, former comrades in arms, knew the location where, and manner in which, he was shot down, among many other details of that past life. There seems to be increasing incidence of cases such as this. Would the Z please explain what is going on here? Further speak to this most intriguing of subjects? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3XZey4tJM8
The soul remembers all lives, all details, though what it shares with a new incarnation varies. In most cases, what the soul shares is limited to the current mission, and the human consciousness is only vaguely aware of that mission during the decisions the human makes many times a day. Thus the soul directs the incarnation with no need to spell out past lives in detail. Why then are there instances where past lives are recalled with specifics? There must be a nexus with the current mission of the soul, where details of the past life will motive the current incarnation to fulfill the mission. Or there is a lingering matter that needs correction, amends to be made, and the soul is in essence explaining to the new incarnation why these efforts should be made.